Automatically translated.View original post

Rural Medical Club, July 26, 2026

26 Jul 69 "Rural Medical Club" Post to "People's Party"

"Not falling the gold card" or just a fancy word?

Criticizing the proposal to amend the law, the People's Party.

According to the People's Party, it has proposed policies and solutions to the National Health Insurance Act 2002, arguing that it "does not knock down the golden card," but reforms for that sustainability.

The Rural Medical Club, as a front worker who has been mingling with foundation health systems for more than two decades, criticizes and questions the proposal with great concern.

The claim "not to fall, but to improve" may sound fancy, good-looking, good-sounding, but when delving into the structural and mechanical details offered by the People's Party, we find paradoxes and danger signs that will affect the gold card system and the rights of the people hugely.

"Let the public-private pay" is the beginning of the collapse of the "universal" principle.

The proposal in Article 5, which specifies the provision of more money by allowing "co-employers" or "opening up the public to use private insurance, supplementary pay," is actually a mutation of the universal health insurance policy, co-pay or co-pay.

New disparities will arise immediately.

The key principle of the golden card is that "everyone is equal with human dignity." If the channel is opened to "pay more for a set of supplementary benefits," there will be a "double health" system. People with money or private insurance will receive better care. People with foundations, the poor will immediately become "second-class patients." The mechanism of health services. The power will depend on hospitals. People have almost no bargaining power.

Bypassing state responsibility, pushing the burden on the public to co-pay or putting private insurance into play, is the first step in the regression from the "universal health coverage" system to the neoliberal health fiscal system, where the state tries to reduce the burden of budget allocations, giving the public more responsibility, and finally, the unbearable will be abandoned.

"Fused 3 funds," the same standard. Or dragged everyone down as low as the state provided?

The proposal combines the main set of benefits of all 3 funds (gold cards, social security, civil servants) to the same standard. It seems to create equity, but in fact.

There is a risk of budgeting. The context and head budget of each fund are completely different. Without a clear budget insurance mechanism, the call for "equality" can become "reducing the benefits of other funds to a limited budget" rather than upgrading the gold card.

A structural conflict crisis, pulling civil service and social security money together without clear administrative answers, would lead to unnecessary conflict between labour groups, civil servants and the general public.

Dismantling the board, solving the problem, or opening up a new capital-influence group, going back to the same point, where power is in the service, the bureaucracy dominates?

The People's Party proposes a restructuring of the SpD board, citing a "long-sitting board" and wants to reduce the proportion of the public sector, but what to watch out for is

The missing balance of power. The current SpD board is designed to interfere with drug and pharmaceutical policy, so that the system loses the bargain mechanism or the set of benefits for the benefit of the people.

Solve outposts not on the spot. The budget isn't just counting payheads.

Despite the People's Party talking about increasing the budget, paying fair compensation, and upgrading primary care services, there are no clear proposals to distribute resources and manpower to the countryside, increasing non-estimated remuneration from the head pay budget, increasing the development budget, improving community hospitals that are so degraded that they have to take the gold card budget to improve hospitals instead, increasing the administration budget for health districts, provincial health offices, district health offices without having to cover the gold card. What to do? Not to mention

Increasing the budget for the NCPO to pay hospitals at real costs, if poorly managed, most of the money will fall to major hospitals in capitals and cities, while community hospitals and hospitals in remote areas will continue to face the same personnel shortage.

The issue of doctors and nurses' resignations is not due to the "Gold Card Law," but to the public sector's manpower management system that cannot manage manpower effectively enough, so the gold card solution is not an itchy scratch.

. Continue to post

7/27 Edited to

... Read moreāđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ­āđˆāļēāļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ§āļīāļžāļēāļāļĐāđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļĄāļĢāļĄāđāļžāļ—āļĒāđŒāļŠāļ™āļšāļ—āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āđāļāđ‰āđ„āļ‚ āļž.āļĢ.āļš.āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļąāļ™āļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļēāļ•āļīāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļĢāļĢāļ„āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļĄāļ„āļīāļ”āļĒāđ‰āļ­āļ™āļāļĨāļąāļšāđ„āļ›āļĒāļąāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļŠāļļāļĄāļŠāļ™ āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļšāļąāļ•āļĢāļ—āļ­āļ‡āļ–āļ·āļ­āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŦāļąāļ§āđƒāļˆāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļāļĐāļēāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļ™āļāļēāļ™āļĢāļēāļ āļˆāļēāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĄāļĩāđ‚āļ­āļāļēāļŠāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļ‡āļēāļ™āļāļąāļšāđ‚āļĢāļ‡āļžāļĒāļēāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļļāļĄāļŠāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļēāļ˜āļēāļĢāļ“āļŠāļļāļ‚āđƒāļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŦāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ„āļāļĨ āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļēāļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ›āļąāļˆāļˆāļļāļšāļąāļ™āļĒāļąāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļŠāđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļšāļļāļ„āļĨāļēāļāļĢāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđāļžāļ—āļĒāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĒāļąāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļžāļ­āļ•āđˆāļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢ āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļēāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ„āļĢāļ­āļšāļ„āļĨāļļāļĄāđāļĨāļ°āļ•āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļŠāļĄāļ­āļ āļēāļ„āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāđāļĄāđ‰āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļˆāļēāļāļšāļąāļ•āļĢāļ—āļ­āļ‡āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ•āļĢāļ‡ āđāļ•āđˆāļāđ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļˆāļēāļāļāļ•āļīāļāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļēāļˆāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒāđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļĢāļđāļ› āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļĄāļĢāļĄāđāļžāļ—āļĒāđŒāļŠāļ™āļšāļ—āđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™ āļ„āļ·āļ­āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļīāļ”āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļˆāđˆāļēāļĒāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļšāļ™āļēāļĒāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļąāļ™āļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļ™āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ•āļīāļĄāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āļœāļĄāđ€āļ­āļ‡āļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ§āđˆāļēāļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđ€āļŠāđ‰āļ™āđāļšāđˆāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāđāļĨāļ°āļœāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļˆāđˆāļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļž āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļĢāđ‰āļēāļĒāđāļĢāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāļ–āđ‰āļ§āļ™āļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđāļ—āđ‰āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ—āđˆāļēāđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļĄāļ—āļēāļ‡āļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāļ„āļ§āļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļąāļāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļ™āļ”āļđāđāļĨ āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļĨāđ„āļāļ•āļĨāļēāļ”āđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļąāļ™āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļ™āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄāļēāļĄāļĩāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļĄāļēāļāđ€āļāļīāļ™āđ„āļ›āļˆāļ™āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ™āļāļēāļ™āļĢāļēāļāļ–āļđāļāļ—āļ­āļ”āļ—āļīāđ‰āļ‡ āļ™āļ­āļāđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­āļˆāļēāļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļ§āļĄāļāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļąāļ™āļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡ 3 āļāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āđˆāļēāļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ—āđāļĨāļ°āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āđāļ•āļāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļēāļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āļŦāļēāļāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļœāļĨāļĨāļšāļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļēāļšāļ§āļ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ‚āļĒāļŠāļ™āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļēāļ‡āļāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ‚āļąāļ”āđāļĒāđ‰āļ‡āđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļœāļđāđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ‚āļĒāļŠāļ™āđŒāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āđ† āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļĄāđ€āļ­āļ‡āļ­āļĒāļēāļāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļĢāļđāļ›āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļļāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļž āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļŠāļĢāļĢāļ—āļĢāļąāļžāļĒāļēāļāļĢāđāļĨāļ°āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ™āđ„āļ›āļĒāļąāļ‡āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āđ† āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļŠāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļĄāļĩāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļāļĐāļēāļ”āļļāļĨāļ­āļģāļ™āļēāļˆāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢāđāļĨāļ°āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ‚āļĒāļŠāļ™āđŒāđāļ—āđ‰āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļ—āđ‰āļēāļĒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ” āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āđƒāļ”āđ† āļ„āļ§āļĢāļĄāļĩāļˆāļļāļ”āļĒāļ·āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļąāđˆāļ™āļ„āļ‡āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļāļĐāļēāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāļ–āđ‰āļ§āļ™āļŦāļ™āđ‰āļē āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāļĨāđ‰āļģ āđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āļŠāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļāļĐāļēāļžāļĒāļēāļšāļēāļĨāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĄāļ­āļ āļēāļ„āđāļĨāļ°āļĻāļąāļāļ”āļīāđŒāļĻāļĢāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĄāļ™āļļāļĐāļĒāđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™āļ—āļļāļāļ„āļ™āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđāļ—āđ‰āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡