1 July 2026

The "P.D." built a sports complex with a gym-pool, the Olympic standard was not finished, but the renovation budget was high, but there was no transparency, lifting the "Holy Siam-Hua Swan" case before meeting the "Proud Thai Congressman," protesting the brakes, the pendant stopped alluding to outsiders.

July 1, 69, the House of Representatives meeting was chaired by the second Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mr. Chuen Phanchaikul, who chaired the meeting to consider the bill.

The People's Party discussed the budgets of independent organizations: the Electoral Commission, the National Commission for the Prevention and Suppression of Corruption, and the Office of the Auditor-General, stating that the budgets of these three independent organizations have a combined total of over 10,195 million to maintain the integrity of the political system, but over the years, these budgets have not been used worthily for the main task, and the agency has also been questioned for the transparency of its duties. The confidence index is depressed, but no one can check the balance.

During the debate, Sen. Nida showed a picture of the election paper, and the senator pointed out the anomaly that the paper was not a common note paper, but an establishment that clearly hit the table, and the result of the vote was exactly the first lottery in 70 consecutive instalments, so the public did not believe that the SEC held the election transparently and witnessed the anomaly in the election of the senator by walking around the key evidence.

According to Sen. Nida, when the acquisition of the current congressman has many allegations and must act as a person's constituent to serve in an independent organization, how can we believe in impartiality and independence?

The Thai Proud Party has risen up to protest that the debate is not on the issue of this motion because it is a consideration of the annual budget, what should be said about the budget, and the legal process is in operation, and ask the panelist to stay on the issue before Mr. Nidha has the Nidada to discuss it.

Then the NCPO discussed the NCPO's budget, saying that the NCPO was accused of protecting corruption from the case of non-clarification of the assets of Sak Siam Chidchuk, former Minister of Transport and former Secretary of the Proud Thai Party, both of which the Constitutional Court had ruled against the Sook Stock case.

He made him respond again to protest that the debate was off the issue and that the names of outsiders were clearly mentioned, and asked the panellists to be careful and on the motion.

The NCPO continued that the NCPO normally requires an in-depth investigation, but in the case of the Professor, there is no preliminary investigation or investigation of the person involved, even if the public is watching and the image of the professor is blurred.

Before he responded to protest again that in the presentation slide, there was a picture of an outsider asking to be removed, so he ruled that he was not allowed to show pictures of outsiders at the meeting, causing the independence leader, the BMA, the People's Party to rise up and protest that he was not neutral, even though the picture was blurred, he did not know who it was, and the protesters did not use the right to refer to the president and the protesters to listen patiently.

Mr. Excellency clarified that if it is a portrait of an outsider, it is not allowed, but if it is blurred until it is not known who it is, it is allowed, but if it is avoided, be careful before giving the MP a discussion.

The NCPO said that the NCPO has many other allegations, including a mother's ring, a friend's loan watch, or a gold bribe.

While the budget of the office building collapsed in the earthquake, it faced a crisis of faith, which questioned transparency in contractor selection and luxury procurement, but what came back was one music video and a circular that comforted the agency.

According to Nida, according to all the above, I want to show whether the personnel statements of the three agencies, which have a total of 7,352 million baht, are worth it. If the SEC can make the election results reflect the needs of the people, the NCPO does not omit any authority, and the NCPO can make every baht tax worthwhile, the public is willing to pay for personnel, but the problem is that it is used to benefit certain groups of people, and there is no way to get out of social defendants.