17 Jul 69
Korat: People flock to appeal "State Welfare Card" tight banks. Non-qualified won state review. Considered according to actual living conditions.
On July 17, 2026, the atmosphere at the Bangkok Bank, the head of the sea branch in Nakhon Ratchasima was bustling. A large number of people gradually arrived to check their rights, inquire and appeal. After checking the status quo, many people said that they did not meet the eligibility criteria, "with many saying that they were disappointed and wanted the public sector to consider the actual living conditions rather than the information in the system alone.
Vivat Chai, a 62-year-old mercenary, revealed that today he appealed to Bangkok Bank after checking the status of the application and found that it did not meet the criteria. Because the system indicates that there is a car type of property, he wanted to inquire and apply for a new inspection.
Mr. Vivat Chai said that he had previously been granted a State Welfare Patent, but this round of screening was more stringent. Knowing that the results were not passed, he regretted that the subsidy, although not very large, could lighten the burden of living on rice, dry food and daily necessities.
Even if you get only 300 baht per month, it can help. For example, buying 500 baht. We issue an additional 200 baht for ourselves, it can reduce the burden. In some cases, there is an additional 200-500 baht subsidy, even if not every time, but it is meaningful for low income people.
Mrs. Dad Retreat, 75, revealed that after a mobile phone rights check, the status was red and unqualified, with no property, no house or land of her own, currently renting a residential home while her husband was disabled, and the children had their own burden and did not send money to help regularly.
Previously granted the State Welfare Patent, the grant relieved the family of much burden, especially the purchase of finished diapers and necessities for disabled husbands. Although the husbands were still entitled, this time they failed to meet the criteria and therefore regretted and did not understand the cause.
Today I am appealing for a clear reason, because there is no large amount of property or deposits and there is a real poverty. If the appeal is ultimately unsuccessful, it is ready to accept the result. Although the grant is not large, it is important for the living and reduces the burden of family expenses.
Mrs. Dad also noted that some people have large deposits or have children working abroad regularly remit money, but also have rights. While they have no property and no income, they do not meet the criteria, they would like the relevant authorities to check the standard of fairness.
Ready to send to the government that it wants to take the area to seriously monitor the living conditions of the people by coordinating community leaders and local people to confirm the facts, because they are those who know how the family is affluent and well-being, and to consider helping those who are in real distress, especially those who do not have their own home and have to care for disabled family members.
As Krungthai Bank officials prepare to accommodate citizens who come to contact and appeal, recommend that the results be reviewed through public sector channels and that the evidence be fully prepared before petitioning for ease and speed of action.
Those who fail the qualification examination can appeal between 17-31 July 2026 through participating agencies and banks, including Bangkok Bank. The staff will provide detailed instructions on the procedures and documents required to ensure the correct implementation of the specified criteria.
āļāļēāļāļāļĢāļ°āļŠāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļąāļ§ āļāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļĢāļąāļāļāļąāļāļĢāļŠāļ§āļąāļŠāļāļīāļāļēāļĢāđāļŦāđāļāļĢāļąāļāđāļāđāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāđāļ§āļĒāđāļŦāļĨāļ·āļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļģāļāļąāļāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļāļđāđāļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļĒāđāļāđāļāđāļāļĒāļāļĒāđāļēāļāļāļĄ āđāļāļĢāļēāļ°āđāļĄāđāļāļģāļāļ§āļāđāļāļīāļāļāļ°āđāļĄāđāļŠāļđāļāļĄāļēāļ āđāļāđāļāđāļāđāļ§āļĒāļĨāļāļ āļēāļĢāļ°āļāđāļēāđāļāđāļāđāļēāļĒāđāļāļāļĩāļ§āļīāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļģāļ§āļąāļāđāļāđāļāļĢāļīāļ āđāļāđāļ āļāļēāļĢāļāļ·āđāļāļāđāļēāļ§āļŠāļēāļĢ āļāļēāļŦāļēāļĢāđāļŦāđāļ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļŠāļīāļāļāđāļēāļāļģāđāļāđāļāļāđāļēāļāđ āļāļĩāđāļāđāļāļāđāļāđāđāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§ āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļāļĢāļąāđāļāļāļĄāđāļāđāđāļāļīāļāļāđāļ§āļĒāđāļŦāļĨāļ·āļāļāļēāļāļāļąāļāļĢāđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļāļļāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāļāļ āđāļĨāđāļ§āļāđāļēāļĒāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāđāļēāļāđāļāļ āļāļķāđāļāļāļģāđāļŦāđāļāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļīāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§āđāļāđāļāđāļēāļĒāļāļķāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āļĨāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļąāļāļ§āļĨāđāļāļāđāļ§āļāļāļĩāđāļĢāļēāļĒāđāļāđāđāļĄāđāđāļāđāļāļāļ āļāļēāļāļāđāļēāļ§āļāļĩāđāđāļŦāđāļāļāļđāđāļāļāļāļģāļāļ§āļāļĄāļēāļāļĄāļēāļĒāļ·āđāļāļāļļāļāļāļĢāļāđāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļāļēāļāđāļĄāđāļāđāļēāļāļāļļāļāļŠāļĄāļāļąāļāļī āđāļāļĒāļāđāļēāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāđāļāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļĩāđāļāļēāļāđāļĄāđāļŠāļ°āļāđāļāļāļŠāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļāļĢāļīāļ āļāļĄāđāļāđāļēāđāļāļāļĩāļ§āđāļēāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļīāļāļŦāļ§āļąāļāļāļąāđāļāļĄāļĩāļĄāļēāļ āđāļāļĢāļēāļ°āļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāđāļāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļēāļāļāļĢāļąāđāļāļāļēāļāđāļĄāđāļāļĢāļāļāļąāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāđāļāļāļĢāļīāļāļāļāļāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§ āļāļķāđāļāļāļģāđāļŦāđāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āđāļĄāļīāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāđāļ§āļĒāđāļŦāļĨāļ·āļāđāļāļīāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļĨāļēāļāđāļāļĨāļ·āđāļāļ āļāļĄāļāļķāļāđāļŦāđāļāļāđāļ§āļĒāļāļąāļāļāđāļāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĢāđāļāļāđāļŦāđāļĢāļąāļāļĨāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāļĩāđāļāļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļāļāļđāđāļāļģāļāļļāļĄāļāļāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļĄāļīāļāļāļēāļāļ°āļāļāļāļāļđāđāļāļāļĢāļąāļāļāļąāļāļĢāļŠāļ§āļąāļŠāļāļīāļāļēāļĢ āđāļāļāļāļĩāđāļāļ°āļāļīāļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļāļēāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāđāļāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļāļāđāļĨāļāđāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāļāļĒāđāļēāļāđāļāļĩāļĒāļ§ āđāļāļĢāļēāļ°āļ§āļīāļāļĩāļāļĩāļ§āļīāļāđāļĨāļ°āļ āļēāļĢāļ°āļāđāļēāđāļāđāļāđāļēāļĒāļāļāļāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§āđāļāļāļāđāļēāļāļāļąāļāļĄāļēāļ āđāļāļĒāđāļāļāļēāļ°āļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§āļāļđāđāļŠāļđāļāļāļēāļĒāļļāļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļĄāļĩāļāļđāđāļāļīāļāļēāļĢ āļāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļĩāđ āļāļđāđāļāļĩāđāļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļĒāđāļāđāļāđāļāļĒāļāļĢāļīāļāđāļāđāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļĩāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļīāļ āļāļēāļāđāļĄāđāđāļāđāļĢāļąāļāļŠāļīāļāļāļīāļāđāļ§āļĒāđāļŦāļĨāļ·āļāļāļĒāđāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļāļ§āļĢ āļāļķāđāļāļĄāļĩāļāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļģāļĢāļāļāļĩāļ§āļīāļāđāļāļĒāļāļĢāļ āļāļķāļāļāļĒāļēāļāđāļŦāđāļŦāļāđāļ§āļĒāļāļēāļāļĢāļąāļāđāļāļīāļāđāļāļāļēāļŠāđāļŦāđāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļāđāļāđāđāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļāļ°āļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļāđāļāļīāđāļĄāđāļāļīāļĄāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļ·āđāļāļāļļāļāļāļĢāļāđ āđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļŦāđāļāļļāļāļāļāļāļĩāđāļāļāļāļĒāļđāđāđāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļģāđāļāđāļāđāļāđāļĢāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļ§āļĒāđāļŦāļĨāļ·āļāļāļĒāđāļēāļāđāļāđāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļāļāļĩāđāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļ·āđāļāļāļļāļāļāļĢāļāđ āļāļ§āļĢāđāļāļĢāļĩāļĒāļĄāđāļāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļ āđāļāđāļ āļŠāļĨāļīāļāđāļāļīāļāđāļāļ·āļāļ āđāļāļāļŠāļēāļĢāđāļŠāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļāļĒāđāļŠāļīāļ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļŦāļāļąāļāļŠāļ·āļāļĢāļąāļāļĢāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļđāđāļāļģāļāļļāļĄāļāļ āđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļāļīāđāļĄāđāļāļāļēāļŠāđāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļĢāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļīāļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļāļĒāđāļēāļāļāļđāļāļāđāļāļāđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļ§āļāđāļĢāđāļ§ āđāļāļĒāđāļāļāļēāļ°āļāļĒāđāļēāļāļĒāļīāđāļāļŦāļēāļāļĄāļĩāļ āļēāļĢāļ°āļāđāļēāđāļāđāļāđāļēāļĒāļŠāļđāļ āđāļāđāļ āļāļēāļĢāļāļđāđāļĨāļāļđāđāļāļīāļāļēāļĢāļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļāļđāđāļŠāļđāļāļ§āļąāļĒāđāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§ āļŠāļļāļāļāđāļēāļĒ āļāļĄāļāļāļŠāđāļāļāļģāļĨāļąāļāđāļāđāļŦāđāļāļļāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§āļāļĩāđāđāļāđāļĢāļąāļāļāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļāļ āđāļĨāļ°āļŦāļ§āļąāļāļ§āđāļēāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļąāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĒāļ·āļāļŦāļĒāļļāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļļāļāļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļĄāļēāļāļāļķāđāļ āđāļāļ·āđāļāļāđāļ§āļĒāđāļŦāļĨāļ·āļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļāļāļĩāđāđāļāļ·āļāļāļĢāđāļāļāļāļĢāļīāļāđāļāđāļāļĒāđāļēāļāļāļąāđāļ§āļāļķāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāļĢāļāļāļļāļ
