Automatically translated.View original post

🧠 The national "brain food" crisis

🧠 The national "brain food" crisis.

"Thai books are failing quality exams."

On the day the world rotates faster, knowledge is produced, disseminated and consumed almost immediately. Books should be one of the few areas that serves to "delay time" for readers to think, analyze, question, and crystallize their thoughts deeply, but what is worrying is that for the Thai book market, this expectation has grown so dim that many people have begun to question whether Thai books are still a "source of intellectual development"?

For reading lovers, the bookstore used to be like an intellectual bunker, an area where we walked in the hope of finding new ideas, new perspectives, or explanations that helped better understand the world. But over the years, that feeling has been replaced by quiet disappointment. Many times, we picked up the book, opened it, flipped it to a few pages, and had to put it back in place before walking out of the store empty-handed.

This phenomenon does not happen because Thais "do not want to read" alone, but because of a deeper and more dangerous question: "What are we offering readers to read?" and what is being offered enhances their thinking or undermines the cognitive potential of society.

📉 Why is the quality of the Thai book market declining?

Looking at the current Thai book, at least three key traps are found that constantly and systematically corrode the quality of "brain food."

* The first is a problem of translation that does not reach the core. A small number of world-class good books, when they are transmitted in Thai, unfortunately lose their cognitive power. The problem is not just mistranslation or idiom, but "out of context." The translator lacks understanding of the cultural background, frame of thought, and intent of the original author, making the content that should be sharp, blunt, and obscure. As a result, the reader has to lose another layer of "Thai-to-Thai translation," which is an intellectual cost that should not be pushed to bear the consumer.

* The second is a commercial book that sells "dreams" rather than truth, a rich, fast-paced, successful book, or a Life Coach full of elegant quotes but without rational evidence, becoming familiar on the Best Seller floor. A small amount of content lacks a connection to the real world, is not logically moderated, and refers to obsolete information that has not yet left the printing press. These not only fool readers, but also incubate misunderstandings about life, work, and the wider economy.

* Third, using conflict as a fuel, some sociopolitical category books choose to go to the ends of ideology rather than presenting information well-rounded to stimulate critical thinking. The result was to create an Echo Chamber that reinforces old beliefs, reinforces divisions, and diminishes society's ability to have rational conversations.

🛠ïļ Why does "brain food" lack quality standards?

In the industrial world, all goods go through quality control, food must have an FDA, appliances must have a TIS, even software must be tested before release, but with books "that serve to shape the thinking, worldview, and decision-making of the whole nation," there is almost no intensive enough screening mechanism.

We leave books where data is aberrant, logic distorted, or irresponsible translation, available mixed with quality books, without any signs, allowing readers to distinguish easily. In countries where reading statistics are not already high, such a lack of standardization pushes potential people to rely on English books or foreign platforms, while most readers with no access to foreign languages inevitably continue to consume low-quality knowledge.

"This is not just a cultural problem, it is a structural problem that accumulates the cost of long-term socio-economic damage."

✍ïļ big problem of knowledge society?

We live in an age when fast communication is very rewarding. Everyone wants to be a YouTuber or TikToker because they reach a lot of people in a short time, but a healthy society cannot rely on short content alone. Sustainable knowledge relies on depth, continuity and systematic composition. Writings are still the most powerful tools.

It is time for us to seriously raise the standard of the Thai book industry. Publishers need to return to the real "Gatekeeper," not just the content factory. At the same time, real experts in various fields need to rise up and impart knowledge through deep, honest and verifiable writing.

Writing books is not just about doing business, but investing in the intellectual capital of the country.

🏗ïļ Knowledge Economy can be strong when you look at books as infrastructure, not complementary products.

Strategically, books should not only be classified as "cultural goods," but should be raised to the level of intellectual infrastructure, not unlike roads, electricity or the Internet.

Countries capable of sustainably enhancing labour productivity, competitiveness and innovation potential are all aggressively investing in this structure, both quality publishing systems, public libraries, high-standard translation works and professional writer support mechanisms.

On the other hand, if it leaves the book market driven solely by "short-term sales" logic, a country may gain a lot of content, but will lose the deep knowledge base used to build on long-term economic, social and public policy.

📊, can we raise Thai books to the national agenda?

If the state and the private sector want to solve this problem seriously, this is not personal taste, but a national strategy of the knowledge economy that requires systematic action.

1. Raise the standards of the editorial and translator professions with context, accuracy and intellectual responsibility.

2. Encourage experts to write seriously, counting knowledge-based writing as a professional work, not a hobby.

3. Invest in quality books, as well as R & D investment, because one good body of knowledge can make an impact across generations.

4.Clearly separate the Influencer role from Thinker. Because short-term perception cannot replace long-term thought structure.

Finally...

Good books do not just provide information, but create a framework for society to make better decisions on a day when the world is more complex every day. If we still leave the country's "brain food" lacking standards, we may not be backward because of a lack of technology, but backward because of a lack of quality ideas.

# Two stories a day

# QualityContent

# ThaiBooks

# KnowledgeInfrastructure

# KnowledgeEconomy

# WritingStandard

1/15 Edited to

... Read moreāļˆāļēāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļĄāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ­āđˆāļēāļ™āļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āļ āļēāļĐāļēāđ„āļ—āļĒāđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ›āļĩāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļĄāļē āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļĨāđˆāļēāļĄāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĢāļđāđ‰āļŠāļķāļāļˆāļ°āđāļāļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āļ•āļĨāļēāļ”āļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āđ† āļœāļĄāļŠāļąāļ‡āđ€āļāļ•āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ„āļ›āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āđƒāļ™āļĢāđ‰āļēāļ™āļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­ āļĄāļąāļāļˆāļ°āļžāļšāļāļąāļšāļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŦāļēāļĒāļąāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĨāļķāļāļ‹āļķāđ‰āļ‡ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļĨāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđāļ›āļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ‚āļēāļ”āļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ— āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļžāļĒāļēāļĒāļēāļĄāđāļ›āļĨāđ„āļ—āļĒāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ„āļ—āļĒāļ­āļĩāļāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļāđˆāļ­āļ™āļˆāļ°āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āđ† āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡āļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļžāļēāļ“āļīāļŠāļĒāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™āļ‚āļēāļĒāļāļąāļ™āđāļšāļšāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§āđ† āđāļĨāļ°āļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆāļ›āļĨāļļāļāļ›āļąāđˆāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ‚āļąāļ”āđāļĒāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ„āļīāļ” āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļšāļēāļ‡āļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™āđˆāļēāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ–āļ·āļ­āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļāļēāļĢāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āđ† āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļ™āļ°āļ„āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ­āļšāļ­āđˆāļēāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļŦāļēāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļĨāļķāļ āļœāļĄāļ„āļīāļ”āļ§āđˆāļēāļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āļĨāļēāļ”āļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āđ„āļ—āļĒāļ„āļ§āļĢāļ—āļģāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļĢāđˆāļ‡āļ”āđˆāļ§āļ™ āļ„āļ·āļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ–āļđāļāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ—āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŦāļēāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļĄāļ‚āđ‰āļ™ āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāļēāļ•āļīāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ›āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļ™āđ„āļĄāđˆāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļœāļīāļ”āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ„āļĨāļļāļĄāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āļ­āđ„āļ›āļŦāļĨāđˆāļ­āļŦāļĨāļ­āļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ„āļīāļ”āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļ™āļ­āđˆāļēāļ™ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āļ„āļ™āļĢāļļāđˆāļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ­āļ™āļēāļ„āļ•āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻ āļœāļĄāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĒāļīāđˆāļ‡āļāļąāļšāđāļ™āļ§āļ„āļīāļ”āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ§āđˆāļē āļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļ–āļđāļāļĄāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđāļ„āđˆāļŠāļīāļ™āļ„āđ‰āļēāđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļ§āļąāļ’āļ™āļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļœāļĨāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ˜āļļāļĢāļāļīāļˆ āđāļ•āđˆāļĄāļąāļ™āļ„āļ·āļ­āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ›āļąāļāļāļēāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļąāļāļĐāļēāļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™āđ€āļ”āļĩāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāļ–āļ™āļ™ āđ„āļŸāļŸāđ‰āļē āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ­āļīāļ™āđ€āļ—āļ­āļĢāđŒāđ€āļ™āđ‡āļ• āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰ āļ•āđˆāļ­āļĒāļ­āļ”āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒ āļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđ€āļĻāļĢāļĐāļāļāļīāļˆ āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ āļđāļĄāļīāļ›āļąāļāļāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āđƒāļˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāđƒāļ™āļ—āļļāļāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ™āļąāļāđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļœāļđāđ‰āđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļŠāļēāļāļĄāļĩāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļŠāļĢāļĢāļ„āđŒāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™āđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļĨāļķāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ„āļļāļ“āļ āļēāļž āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļąāļšāļĄāļēāļ—āļģāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ„āļ§āļšāļ„āļļāļĄāļ„āļļāļ“āļ āļēāļž (Gatekeeper) āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āļˆāļąāļ‡ āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāđ‚āļ āļ„āļĄāļĩāļ­āļēāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ”āļĩ āđāļĨāļ°āļĨāļ”āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļāļēāļĢāļ–āļđāļāļŠāļąāļāļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļœāļīāļ”āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āđ‚āļĨāļāļ—āļąāļĻāļ™āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļīāļ”āđ€āļžāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ™ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŠāļĢāļļāļ› āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļĄāđāļ‚āđ‡āļ‡āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļŠāļąāļĒāļ—āļąāļĻāļ™āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļĄāļ·āļ­āļˆāļēāļāļ—āļļāļāļāđˆāļēāļĒāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ āļēāļ„āļĢāļąāļ āļ āļēāļ„āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāļžāļĨāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĒāļāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āđ„āļ—āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ•āļ­āļšāđ‚āļˆāļ—āļĒāđŒāļĒāļļāļ„āđ€āļĻāļĢāļĐāļāļāļīāļˆāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰ āđāļĨāļ°āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļĢāļē “āļĨāđ‰āļēāļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāđƒāļŠāđˆāđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ‚āļēāļ”āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩ āđāļ•āđˆāđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ‚āļēāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ„āļīāļ”āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ„āļļāļ“āļ āļēāļžâ€