Who is "His Majesty"?
Who is "His Majesty"?
(Why can this faith be so widespread in modern times?)
Over the decades, the name of "His Majesty the King" has become one of the most common wording in Thai society, whether in the construction of Buddhas, the construction of temples, large-scale philanthropy, the recounting of meditative experiences, or even conversation among the seekers of mental peace.
At the same time, this call creates many questions, such as
"Who is Your Majesty?"
"Is he the same as Gusantho in Phatra Gap?"
"Why has this belief expanded so rapidly in recent decades?"
And even more importantly, how should we understand this without confusing faith beliefs and the traditional doctrines of Buddhism?
So this article tries to explain it systematically, clearly.
* What is the part of the Bible?
* What is a faith-based interpretation?
* And what does this phenomenon reflect about society and people's minds in modern times?
= = = =
1) Who is "His Majesty" in the understanding of the faithful?
The word "Majesty" is not a name that appears directly in the Tripitaka, nor is it in the list of Buddhas in the Theravada, but a term that occurs in the beliefs of some teachers and practitioners in Thailand, who use the word "Majesty" to refer to the earliest Buddha in the entire Buddha line.
In the view of believers, this concept has profound meaning, such as
* It was the Buddha who first discovered the way out of suffering.
* Who opened the way for other Buddhas in later times to follow in their footsteps.
* Is like the beginning of the line of enlightenment of all Buddhas.
* So the feeling that paying homage to His Majesty is like paying homage to the "origin" of all Buddhas.
However, it must be understood that this concept is a faith-based exposition, not a direct reference to scripture, and may therefore vary from practice to practice. The significance of this point is not to judge right or wrong, but to understand the context of such a term.
= = = =
2) Why is there confusion with Gusantho Buddha?
A common confusion stems from the word "first," which seems to mean the same thing, but literally lies in a different time frame.
In Theravada Buddhism, there is the concept of "Phatra Gap," which is a Gap with five enlightenment Buddhas:
1. Phra Kusandha
2. Phra Konak Khom
3. Phra Gus
4. Somancodom (present Buddha)
5. Sririyamitreya (future Buddha)
So when they hear the word "First," many interpret it as the first of these, which is Gusandha.
But in the line of belief, the word "Majesty" refers to the first Buddha in a cosmological way, not limited to the present, that is,
* Gusondha = The first of Phatra Gap
* Majesty = First in a devout concept that looks back beyond the present Gap.
When the word "first" is used in the same way, but in different contexts, confusion can easily arise.
= = = =
3) Why is Faith Genesis so prevalent in the latter?
This phenomenon is not accidental, but in line with the changes of Thai society and the world over the past several decades.
3.1 Publication of the teachings of practical teachers
* Many teachers have recounted meditative experiences associated with the Buddha in the past, causing many disciples to build faith and begin creating images in the name of His Majesty Genesis in various places.
* The recounting of these experiences helps to make matters that were previously limited to the public.
3.2 Age of life insecurity
* The modern world is full of rapid changes in economy, work, and social relations.
* So many people seek a mental anchor that feels stable and safe.
* Linking oneself to the origin of all Buddhas feels like it's connected to a more solid spiritual foundation than the ever-changing world.
3.3 New Age communication makes belief widespread fast
* From the age of books and tapes, to the age of the Internet and social media, religious narratives and spiritual experiences were quickly disseminated.
* What used to be confined to specific groups became accessible to the public.
3.4 Feeling connected to the ultimate origin
* Psychologically, humans value origins, whether ancestral, homeland, or cultural roots.
* The word "First" therefore creates a sense of being connected to the entire line of the Buddha, which results in faith easily.
= = = =
4) Traditional Buddhist view?
In the Tripitaka mentions a large number of Buddhas that have happened in various Gap, and does not indicate that there is only one First Buddha, because the universe and Gap have happened and gone out innumerable, in other words.
"It is almost impossible to point out who the earliest Buddha was in the cosmological sense."
Therefore, the calling of the King should be understood as a faith call rather than a scriptural reference. Understanding this point allows us to respect people's beliefs without conflict with traditional doctrines.
= = = =
5) Why are these generations increasingly interested in the past nation and Buddha?
This phenomenon clearly reflects the changes of contemporary society. The modern world has made many people feel lacking in life foundation, migrating, moving jobs, unstable relationships, and smaller families.
The question "Who are we? Where are we from?" occurs in the hearts of many people.
* Many past nations and Buddhas helped create a sense that life is continuous, not starting and ending only for a short time.
* On the one hand, the concept of karma and birth diversions explains life's inequalities, making it easier for many to accept what they face.
* However, the Buddha emphasized, "Knowing who we were born is not as important as exonerating the present."
* For despite knowing all about the past, if the mind is still filled with anger, greed, or passion, suffering remains.
"The crux of Buddhism therefore lies not in exploring the past, but in changing the mind of the present."
= = = =
Conclusion The understanding of Majesty can be summarized simply as
* It is a devout term that occurs in later Thai society.
* Not a name in the Buddha account according to the Theravada.
* The confusion was caused by mixing with the first Buddha in Phatthapakap.
* The ubiquity of beliefs is consistent with the psychologically dependent needs of people in modern times.
After all, whatever form of faith may take, Buddhism always points back to the old question:
"Can we make our hearts calmer, lighter, and more distressed today?"
Because real life change does not start with the past, but with the present change of mind, and perhaps understanding faith can allow us to respect both faith and doctrine simultaneously.
ในฐานะที่ได้ศึกษาและสัมผัสกับเรื่องราวของสมเด็จองค์ปฐมในแง่มุมของผู้แสวงหาความสงบทางใจ ผมพบว่าการเข้าใจความเชื่อนี้ไม่เพียงแค่เสริมสร้างความศรัทธาเท่านั้น แต่ยังเปิดโอกาสให้เราตั้งคำถามสำคัญเกี่ยวกับจิตใจและความหมายของการปฏิบัติธรรมในยุคสมัยนี้ อย่างแรก ความเชื่อที่ว่าสมเด็จองค์ปฐมเป็นต้นสายแห่งพระพุทธเจ้าทั้งหมดแสดงถึงความต้องการของมนุษย์ที่จะเชื่อมโยงกับรากฐานหรือแหล่งกำเนิดของสิ่งสูงสุดในทางศาสนา ซึ่งเป็นเรื่องธรรมชาติของจิตใจที่หาความมั่นคงและความรู้สึกปลอดภัยทางจิตวิญญาณ โดยเฉพาะในยุคที่โลกเต็มไปด้วยความไม่แน่นอนและเปลี่ยนแปลงอย่างรวดเร็ว สิ่งที่ผมสังเกตได้อีกอย่างคือการขยายตัวของความศรัทธานี้ส่วนหนึ่งเกิดจากครูบาอาจารย์และผู้ปฏิบัติธรรมที่แบ่งปันประสบการณ์ทางสมาธิและการเข้าถึงพระพุทธเจ้าในอดีตกาล สิ่งนี้ช่วยเปิดประตูให้คนทั่วไปเข้าถึงเรื่องราวที่เดิมทีอาจถูกจำกัดในวงปฏิบัติธรรมเท่านั้น นอกจากนี้การสื่อสารผ่านช่องทางสมัยใหม่อย่างสื่อโซเชียลมีเดียยังเป็นแรงผลักดันที่สำคัญให้คำเล่าเรื่องนี้แพร่หลายอย่างรวดเร็ว ในมุมมองส่วนตัว ผมคิดว่าการแยกแยะระหว่างความเชื่อเชิงศรัทธากับหลักคำสอนดั้งเดิมของพระพุทธศาสนาเป็นสิ่งสำคัญมาก เพราะจะช่วยให้เราเคารพและให้เกียรติความเชื่อของผู้อื่นได้ ในขณะเดียวกันก็ไม่สับสนจนเกิดความเข้าใจผิดเกี่ยวกับแก่นแท้ของพระธรรมคำสอน สุดท้ายนี้ ผมมองว่าหน้าที่สำคัญของผู้ที่สนใจคือการนำความเข้าใจเหล่านี้ไปต่อยอดในชีวิตประจำวัน ไม่ใช่แค่รู้จักสมเด็จองค์ปฐมในฐานะบุคคลหรือความเชื่อเท่านั้น แต่คือการใช้ความเชื่อนี้เป็นแรงบันดาลใจในการทำให้จิตใจสงบ เบา และพ้นทุกข์ในปัจจุบัน ซึ่งตรงกับเป้าหมายหลักของพระพุทธศาสนาอย่างแท้จริง