Replacement of Acting Under the Cottage Plant Act 2565

"The Legal Gap and Knowledge Tragedy of Thai Cottage Farmers."

1. Analyze plant physiology mistakes: "tree torture" instead of production.

Planting a concentrated cabin, or using a depressed loader to tilt the tree to hope for a new peak (Bending / Layering) is a reflection of "compass-free effort."

Food scrambling (Competition): Growing too close together causes the root system to scramble for nutrients and oxygen, resulting in low cargranate and significant substance accumulation (Mitragynine).

Structural trauma: Using a depressed loader damages the food conduit (Phloem) and the water conduit (Xylem). The tree will enter a state of "stress," which may yield in the short term, but the tree is short-lived and a fungal deposit.

Spatial differences: The central and southern regions have a traditional knowledge base (Local Wisdom), making sense of the nature of huts that require good sunshine and ventilation. That the northeast is doing differently is not "innovative" but a worrying "misunderstanding."

2. Systemic Failure: "Plants without parents."

He made a very sharp analysis of the "legal treatment" issue at the heart of the inter-agency overlap / gap problem:

Agency, Current Role (According to the Act 1965), Actual Restrictions

Department of Justice, overseeing removal from drug / control laws, emphasizing "suppress / control," no expertise in "promote planting."

Ministry of Health, oversee drug implementation / consumer safety, focus on "downstream" (products), do not understand "upstream" management (planting plots).

The Ministry of Agriculture is barred from orbit, has a mechanism (agriculture, district / district), but does not have the full authority of the Act, so does not dare to move the budget.

The result: farmers became "fatherless children." When they went to agriculture, the district was told that it was an old (fair) drug story. When they went to public health, they talked about drug factories, so Thai farmers had to "trial and error" until they produced an unconventional planting picture, as you saw.

3. Policy recommendation: "Return the hut to the Ministry of Agriculture."

To bring the problem to an end in accordance with the guidelines you have laid down, the following should be driven:

Strategy 1: Legal Amendment

Proposed to amend the Cottage Plants Act 1965 to "the Minister of Agriculture and Cooperatives" as acting under this Act.

Designate the cottage as a full "alternative cash crop" under the supervision of the Department of Agriculture.

Strategy 2: Creation of the "Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)"

Make an accurate "Isan Model" cottage planting guide based on the teacher plots in the central and southern regions that we are going to study.

Use the "Smart Farmer" mechanism, or local model farmers, as a knowledge distribution point; instead of waiting for government agencies that are still puzzled by their role.

Strategy 3: Creating a clear "Value Chain"

When the Ministry of Agriculture comes to care, it can set the GAP (Good Agricultural Practices) standard for the cottage, which will allow the cottage leaves from the northeast to be shipped to the Frieze Dry factory in an international standard.

Summary of views:

To take northeastern farmers to see the central and southern regions is "the most practical solution," because it breaks the wrong wall of knowledge with "the truth of the eye," and to propose the Acting Act is "the structural solution" that will make Thai huts sustainable.

Sincerely.

The Maj. developed the Chai Gods.

24 March 2019