Automatically translated.View original post

Emotions over reason ðŸĪŊ

This story looks strange, but it's true.

Humans value the feeling of loss.

More. Feel it.

Josh will show many examples.

If you lose 1,000 baht, you will feel

Very sorry.

And if you get $1000 back,

You're just gonna feel okay coming back.

Even after the same return.

But some people may be very happy to have it back.

Teenagers who started working for a few years started thinking

Own bonus.

Each will expect a bonus this year.

Let's say I think I'll get 60,000.

But the bonus actually came out with only 57,000 baht.

You will not feel as good as you hoped.

You will see your friends get bonuses as others hope.

Think about it. You get more money.

But why does our feelings look like we lost?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I'll let you choose between

Get 10,000 baht for free.

And throw heads tails. If you get heads, take it. 20,000 baht.

But if you throw tails, you get nothing.

What would you choose?

Another question.

You're gonna lose 10,000.

If you get a head, you lose 20,000.

But if you throw tails, you lose nothing.

What would you choose?

By the first question, Josh believes that many people

I'm going to choose $10,000 for free.

Instead of risking 20,000 or nothing.

Because the emotions involved

When we have to decide to be sure of the risks,

Most people tend to choose. Sure.

With the second question, Josh believes that many people

You choose to risk 20,000 or nothing.

Instead of losing 10,000.

Because in my heart it feels like

There's nothing to lose, so take a risk.

It would be like gambling.

We risked losing money to get our capital back.

Makes you want to bet on bigger money.

In order to get a large sum of money back.

Even if it costs more.

Emotions caused by a lack of self-inhibition and self-control.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

In conclusion,

When you are afraid of risk

When broken, risk.

By this theory, he called Prospect Theory.

People often give more than the value of loss.

It's from Daniel Kahneman.

And Amos Tversky.

Loss Aversion theory, human feelings when losing.

That will always be more intense than the feeling it gets.

Because the loss is painful.

More than the same amount of happiness received.

📍 what does that have to do with us?

Where do we keep the money today?

The average inflation rate is 2-3% or more, a savings account or an account that we keep every day.

Give me 0.25% interest a year?

Many people know that investment can yield more, but fear the volatility of the stock market.

Could be caused by a negative information response.

That has a 20% -50% chance of loss.

Or a 50% loss.

But refusing to choose to cut the loss

Because afraid to lose this stock.

That's why

Why do most people make missed decisions and make no sense?

That's because emotions are always above reason.

You can easily take away this feeling.

To just apply this to yourself.

📍 ask yourself what you're afraid of. Why are you afraid?

📝, write or speak.

Being drained makes us feel better.

Including, better understand that fear than let it circle your head.

You have to stop blocking your future.

Really conscious and rational.

Looking at the long-term picture more than the present.

Open up to study knowledge. Humans are afraid of the unknown.

How to overcome it, you just find out more.

# Trending # Behavioral economics # lemon 8 diary # Develop yourself # Psychology

2/27 Edited to

... Read moreāļˆāļēāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§ āļœāļĄāļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­āđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļœāļĨāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āđƒāļŦāļāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļĄāļēāļāļāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āđƒāļˆāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āđ† āļ—āļ­āļ‡āđ† āđƒāļ™āļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļĒāļāļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāļ”āļ—āļąāļ™āļ—āļĩ 1000 āļšāļēāļ— āļāļąāļšāļĢāļ­āļ­āļĩāļ 3 āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 1500 āļšāļēāļ— āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļ™āļĄāļąāļāđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŠāļ”āđ„āļ›āđ€āļĨāļĒ āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ–āđ‰āļēāļ„āļģāļ™āļ§āļ“āļœāļĨāļ•āļ­āļšāđāļ—āļ™āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§ āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ 1500 āļšāļēāļ—āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡ 3 āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļˆāļ°āđāļŠāļ”āļ‡āļ–āļķāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ•āļ­āļšāđāļ—āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļĄāļēāļ āļ™āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļžāļīāļŠāļđāļˆāļ™āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĪāļĐāļŽāļĩ Prospect Theory āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļ™āļļāļĐāļĒāđŒāļāļĨāļąāļ§āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāđ€āļāļīāļ™āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢ āđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļ­āļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļ™āđˆāļ™āļ­āļ™āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡ āđāļĄāđ‰āļœāļĨāļ•āļ­āļšāđāļ—āļ™āļˆāļ°āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļē āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļŦāļĨāļēāļāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđƒāļ™āļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āđ€āļĢāļēāļˆāļ°āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ§āđˆāļē āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļāđ‰āļ­āļ™āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āđ‚āļšāļ™āļąāļŠ āđāļ™āļ§āđ‚āļ™āđ‰āļĄāļˆāļ°āļāļĨāļąāļ§āđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āđ„āļ§āđ‰āđƒāļ™āļšāļąāļāļŠāļĩāļ­āļ­āļĄāļ—āļĢāļąāļžāļĒāđŒāļ”āļ­āļāđ€āļšāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ•āđˆāļģāđ† āđāļ—āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļ°āļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ•āđˆāļ­ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāļāļĨāļąāļ§āļ‚āļēāļ”āļ—āļļāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļđāđ‰āļ„āļ™āļŦāļĨāļĩāļāđ€āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡ āđāļĄāđ‰āļˆāļ°āđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāđ‚āļ­āļāļēāļŠāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ•āļīāļšāđ‚āļ•āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ—āļļāļ™āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āļĒāļēāļ§ āļœāļĄāļĒāļąāļ‡āđ€āļ„āļĒāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļ„āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āđƒāļ™āļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ•āļāļĨāļ‡āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļē 50% āđāļ•āđˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāļāļĨāđ‰āļēāļ•āļąāļ”āđƒāļˆāļ‚āļēāļĒ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļāļĨāļąāļ§āđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļāđ‰āļ­āļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ„āļ›āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļŦāļĄāļ” āļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļĒāļēāļāļĢāļ­āđ‚āļ­āļāļēāļŠāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļāļĨāļąāļšāļĄāļē āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ•āļīāļ”āļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļˆāđ‡āļšāļ›āļ§āļ” āđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļĄāļēāļāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āđ„āļ›āļ­āļĩāļ āļ™āļĩāđˆāļˆāļķāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ”āļĩāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāļ„āļĢāļ­āļšāļ‡āļģāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļœāļĨāļˆāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļĨāļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļ°āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļĄāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļāļēāļĢāļ–āļēāļĄāļ•āļąāļ§āđ€āļ­āļ‡āļ§āđˆāļēāļāļĨāļąāļ§āļ­āļ°āđ„āļĢāđāļĨāļ°āļ—āļģāđ„āļĄ āļ–āļķāļ‡āđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ„āļīāļ”āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļŠāļķāļāļ­āļ­āļāļĄāļēāļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļžāļđāļ”āļ„āļļāļĒāļāļąāļšāļ„āļ™āđƒāļāļĨāđ‰āļŠāļīāļ” āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļāļĨāļąāļ§āļ–āļđāļāđāļ›āļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āđ€āļ—āđ‡āļˆāļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰ āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļĨāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ§āļīāļ•āļāļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāđāļĨāļ°āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āđƒāļˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āļĩāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āļŠāļļāļ”āļ—āđ‰āļēāļĒ āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļĒāļ­āļĄāļĢāļąāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­āđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļœāļĨāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ›āļāļ•āļīāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĄāļ™āļļāļĐāļĒāđŒ āđāļ•āđˆāļ–āđ‰āļēāđ€āļĢāļēāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āļ—āļģāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ—āļĪāļĐāļŽāļĩāđ€āļĻāļĢāļĐāļāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļąāļ‡āđ€āļāļ•āļ•āļąāļ§āđ€āļ­āļ‡āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡ āđ€āļĢāļēāļˆāļ°āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āđƒāļˆāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļŠāļ•āļī āđāļĨāļ°āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļœāļĨāļ„āļ§āļšāļ„āļđāđˆāļāļąāļšāļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŠāļĄāļ”āļļāļĨāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĒāļąāđˆāļ‡āļĒāļ·āļ™āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āļĒāļēāļ§āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđāļ—āđ‰āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡