Reflecting on the evolution of information sharing, it’s striking how social media has transformed the way we engage with news and social issues. Historically, before social media, people relied heavily on word of mouth, newspapers, and radio to get information. Despite limited reach compared to today's digital platforms, major social movements still resulted in significant societal changes, often involving great risks and sacrifices, even lives. Today, with platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, we have unprecedented access to real-time information and firsthand accounts of events happening around the world. For example, videos of children being forcibly removed from airports by ICE agents spread rapidly across social channels, sparking outrage and debate. Despite this flood of evidence, it often feels like we’re stuck in a cycle of witnessing injustice without meaningful change. From my experience, the challenge lies in the overwhelming volume of content and the resulting desensitization. Constant exposure to crises can cause compassion fatigue; people become mentally exhausted and less likely to engage deeply or take action. Furthermore, the nature of social media algorithms can encourage echo chambers and polarization, fragmenting collective efforts and reducing the impact of any individual’s voice. Another factor is the difference between witnessing events online and mobilizing for change offline. The ease of sharing a post or liking a video doesn’t always translate into real-world activism. The infrastructure for sustained change requires organization, resources, and often risking personal safety or comfort, which can be daunting in a highly digitized society. Ultimately, while social media provides powerful tools to highlight injustice and inform the public, it also demands more from users to convert awareness into action. Understanding this dynamic can help us find new ways to overcome apathy and channel digital engagement into meaningful progress.