Having used various national park passes over the years, I’ve noticed that changes in pass design and pricing can significantly affect visitor experiences, especially for those with disabilities. The highlighted phrase "perk for being disabled" reminds me of how crucial it is for parks to offer meaningful accessibility benefits rather than just symbolic gestures. Increasing prices for non-residents can create barriers to enjoying these public lands and impact the diversity of visitors. Meanwhile, slashing park funding often leads to reduced maintenance, fewer programs, and a diminished natural experience. I personally feel that a park pass should do more than just show support through imagery; it should provide tangible support through reasonable pricing, inclusive policies, and dedicated funding to maintain and improve park resources. For disabled visitors, accommodations and perks should be clearly communicated and genuinely helpful—not just presented superficially. If fees continue to rise without reinvesting in the parks or addressing accessibility, the value of these passes diminishes, and public enthusiasm may wane. Sharing this perspective aims to spark thoughtful discussion about how to balance funding, accessibility, and visitor engagement in national parks, ensuring that everyone can appreciate and care for these treasured lands.