seriously
I mean think about it, if the highest speed limit in most places is 75-85 MPH then why do we even need the capability? I understand that the engine is designed to be capable of going to higher speeds because then it puts less strain on the engine at lower speeds and improves engine health but there should be a safety design where, despite the ability, cruise control just kinda kicks in at 85-90 with the exception to first responders, emergency, and race track vehicles.
In recent years, the discussion surrounding vehicle design and speed limitations has gained traction. Many experts argue that everyday cars should not be engineered to exceed 100 MPH due to safety reasons. Current speed limits in most regions hover around 75-85 MPH, leading to questions about the need for higher capabilities. The rationale behind higher speed potential primarily lies in engine efficiency and performance, helping to maintain engine health by reducing strain during lower speed driving. However, implementing automatic cruise control mechanisms at around 85-90 MPH for non-emergency vehicles could significantly enhance road safety. Such systems could prevent drivers from inadvertently exceeding safe speeds while allowing exceptions for first responders and race track situations. Increasing awareness about the risks of high-speed driving can also be pivotal in reducing road accidents. Balancing performance with safety in automotive design remains crucial, ultimately leading to a safer driving experience for everyone on the road.
indeed. no reason some normal cars should be able to reach F1 speeds (not really but there's some out there, just not common because of how expensive they are) i got a bmw and im SCARED of the gas pedal