This social experiment dives into a heart-wrenching question: would churches actually help a starving baby by providing formula? The topic touches on critical themes such as charity, religious organizations' community roles, and their tax-exempt status. Many people often expect churches to be pillars of aid and compassion, reflecting Christian teachings like 'What Would Jesus Do?' (#wwjd) and pro-life values, emphasizing care for vulnerable lives. Yet, when tested, responses may vary widely depending on the individual church's resources, policies, and willingness to act promptly. Importantly, churches often rely on donations and volunteer efforts to provide charity. However, critics highlight that their tax-exempt status could imply a greater obligation to serve urgent community needs such as feeding hungry infants. Individuals are also challenged to reflect on their personal actions. The experiment invites viewers to ask themselves not only what their churches would do but what they themselves are willing to do to help, moving beyond rhetoric to meaningful aid. This discussion also raises awareness about the baby formula shortages and infant starvation crises that some families face. The availability of formula is a life-or-death issue for many infants, making timely assistance crucial. Understanding the social experiment encourages us to think critically about the roles religious institutions and communities play in addressing social problems. It also sheds light on how tax policies relate to expectations of charitable contribution and support. Engaging in this dialogue provides a platform to promote accountability, compassion, and proactive assistance to those in urgent need, while challenging institutions and individuals alike to step up in tangible ways.