As much as you folks lie and.....

From my own readings and reflections on the crucifixion narratives, it is fascinating how science and ancient texts intersect yet diverge in explaining these events. The mention of a "blood moon" on the night of the crucifixion is often cited as a powerful sign, but digging deeper reveals complexities. For instance, lunar eclipses—which cause the moon to appear red—occur only at night. Meanwhile, the Gospel of Luke describes darkness during the day, from noon to 3 pm, which can’t be attributed to the lunar eclipse. This suggests different phenomena were likely conflated over time. Also, considering astronomical details, Passover was celebrated during a full moon, making a solar eclipse impossible to explain the daytime darkness described, as solar eclipses occur only during a new moon. This mismatch highlights the potential symbolic interpretations driving these accounts rather than purely scientific observations. The reference in Acts of the Apostles to the moon turning to blood is quoted from older prophetic texts such as the Book of Joel. This points to a tradition of using vivid, symbolic language to express hope, judgment, or divine intervention rather than reporting a literal astronomical event. Lastly, the claim that modern NASA confirmations validate biblical events should be approached critically. While NASA can predict and confirm historical eclipses, they do not verify theological or prophetic interpretations. This distinction is crucial to maintain an accurate understanding. From a personal perspective, exploring these nuances has broadened my appreciation for the rich tapestry of historical, scientific, and theological insights. It reminds me to question popular narratives and seek out the evidence thoughtfully, recognizing the power of symbolism alongside empirical data.