Being an employee, but calling the bonus as much as the owner of the company. Do you really think this?

In this case, the company clearly stated in its guidebook that if you work for 10 years, never lack, never take sick leave for 10 years, you will pay a bonus with 3 baht of gold.

People work for 10 years without ever taking sick leave to wait for the award that the company drafted. Why do people insult them? (Employment manuals are available to read. Look at it.) But if you say that the employment manual is not an employment contract, you can't condone the company. And if I make a mistake, I'm not liable, right?

The question is, if the company is going to write an incentive guide like this, why not adjust the plan every year, or keep the gold because the price of gold is already rising every year, or is it happy? For 10 years, no employee will be sick (however, management must look further if it happens in the worst case).

If you are on the side of the company that the bonus is not regular, is to give or not to give. The next question is why to write in the first place. This case is not illegal, the employment is true. But the company is clearly wrong with the employees. The KPI set itself. The reward is set by itself. When the employees can push the square.

I worked a month, I didn't know how many days I was sick, I was sick, I never took sick leave for 10 years. Think about how much people look forward to.# Daikin # Bonus money