Many expressions are often missed if the parties fight. 🫣

# This important issue I listen to every day55 minutes.

Discipline examinations, infringement examinations, or exercise of authority for non-licensing must give the parties the opportunity to fully dispute the facts under section 30 W.1 of the Royal Procedure Act. ✍♪ Usually you have a notice for the accused to argue the facts?✍ * You will reply that you have given the opportunity for facts and then a notice to argue, and then you give the opportunity for facts. ✨ But it is not a fact that the committee gives the opportunity to argue for such evidence.

That is, the point is important.

📣 adjustment of the chapter of law under article 30, paragraph one. ✨

♪ Before being an administrative order ♪What the investigating officer misses the most may not be seen in many cases, and may understand that he has given the opportunity and informed the facts. There is a letter calling for the parties to argue to give evidence.

✨

.# What should be like isThe facts must be summarized as (a lump), inform the real tab, facts such as this are facts that sound like the end of 30 V.1 + 37 ✍# The examiner must reverseNotify the parties of the facts. The facts under section 30 W.1 Despite the facts under section 30 W.1, the parties must be adequately informed of the facts, even if section 30 W.1 does not indicate that the facts to be notified to the parties refer to any statement of fact, it must be understandable that such facts as that are facts to be used as a reason for issuing the order (the opportunity must be given to the affected person, the right to an order of argument, to give evidence, ✍ Article 30, paragraph one + Article 37, Practice Act 1996).

🗃️ sorted by forensics. ✨ 🗂️