1 May 69

"World" against "Tintin," there is no "average suffering, average happiness," as the prime minister said, but only moving suffering from one group of people to another harder than before, pointing out that the government does not dare to touch the source of the expensive electricity, and the government is still fine, unfazed.

May 1, 69, President Sujuti Chaisaj, Congressman Roster, People's Party

[No, "average suffering, average happiness," as you said, only "moving suffering" from one group of people to pressing on the other even harder, even though the public is still carrying the same burden of electricity.]

The new electricity bill structure that the government is proud of does not solve the problem at the root, but forces the people to bear it together.

When thinking about policy, Prime Minister, did you ever think that this kind of policy is aggravating many groups of people who try to adapt to survive? Many of the houses together try to save the most cost-effective use of fire, but they have to get more cost-effective, just because the total consumption is higher. People who escape expensive fuel prices turn to electric cars to reduce their energy burden, and they have to pay more for their electricity.

This is not a policy that helps the public, but it is to "push the burden" on the public to solve problems among themselves. While the root of the expensive electricity bill has never been touched.

Whether it's monopolistic electricity market structures, inflated availability costs, or promises that benefit certain energy capital groups, energy capitalists who act as "non-eating" are fine, not even daunted.

What you're saying today is not average happiness, but it's about making most people suffer the same, just change who's going to suffer more.