21 May 69

"Sri Suwan" invaded the "CAT." Cried to dissolve the "Orange Party." The post accused the Privy Council-Government of acting improperly.

On May 21, 2026, at the Office of the SEC, Building B, Mr. Sri Suwan Pathya came to petition the Electoral Commission (SEC) and the Registrar of Political Parties for an investigation or investigation into the People's Party (P.C.) in a case of Facebook posting a message accusing the government of abusing the monarch's democratic principles, of wrongdoing with the Constitution and or the law, of eroding the institution or not.

As of May 20, 69, the People's Party (P.C.) posted a message on Facebook accusing the government of acting improperly, risking a violation of the monarch's democratic principles, which seemed superficial to the subject of the post, but considering the content of the entire message, it would be a reprimand for the performance of the "Privy Council" to the monarch who claimed that it might interfere with the government's administration or not.

According to the provisions of the 2017 Constitution, section 6 clearly states that "the King is in a reverential capacity, and whoever does not violate, who does not accuse or impeach the King in any way," and in section 10, paragraph 2, it also states that "the Privy Council is responsible for commenting on the King in all mythology consulted by the King and has other duties as provided for in the Constitution," where the Privy Council meets the National Disaster Prevention and Relief Command (B.C.). To prepare for the 2026 drought, it marks the usual government introduction that has been in practice since 2017.

It is a huge benefit to the Thai people because the Privy Council is the adult of the city that the King has placed the heart to help provide consultation, a person who has passed the country all his life, a former military officer, an executive, and a very experienced economist. Therefore, when the Privy Council comes down to meet with the government, not just to listen, but to see where the work of the agencies is going, what problems are going, and how to advise the most effective people.

So the People's Party Posting expressions of reproach against the government, but affecting the duties of the Privy Council, has caused a huge wave of criticism of such posts in society, on social media, on coffee, etc. There have been conflicts of thought and action that have not previously appeared. It may be considered that the People's Party has the intention of acting in opposition to the monarch-head democracy and or acting to harass or threaten the public order or morality, as well as to interfere with the civil service practices of government agencies, as prohibited by section 45, section 92 (2) (3) (4) of the Proclamation. . With regard to Political Parties, 2017 and the Constitution, 2017, Article 101 (7)?

The patriotic, patriotic, land-loving organization then brought a complaint to the Electoral Commission (SEC) and the Registrar of Political Parties asking it to exercise the power to investigate and investigate the matter. If it was found to be a breach or a misdemeanor, it was submitted to the Constitutional Court for the dissolution of the party in accordance with Constitution 2017, Article 92.