22 May 69

"Sutra" sent a team of lawyers to add "Ice Love Shank." The post knot accuses "the bad-tempered person" of not suing the gag, but defending the right to warn the person sharing the clip or message. If there is an intent to insult or damage, all cases will be prosecuted.

On May 22, 2026, the Minister of Natural Resources and the Environment, Dr. Nutthashan Wongniam, a team of lawyers, reported the prosecution of the Rakshanok Srikon, or "Ice Rakshanok," a roster of the People's Party, in addition, at the handsome Gold Congressman, in a case of posting messages on social media in a "humble way," seeing that it distorted the facts and caused damage to the reputation.

Dr. Nutsuk revealed that he had previously reported to the Rakshanok MP once at the handsome gold precinct on May 17. In 2026, in the case of the post of the "evil man of the city-graft," in which a statement was falsely entangled and corrupted by the minister, the interrogator was given a legal procedure. After that day, the matter was thought to have been terminated, but later it was posted in an allusive manner, not directly mentioning Mr. Sutra, but with blasphemous words, such as accusing him of being a "lame man" or a "lame man," which was seen as distorting the facts and damaging the reputation.

Dr. Nutsuk confirmed that Mr. Supat passed the constitutional qualifications examination before taking office and that there had never been a serious breach of ethics, so he needed to defend his rights.

In addition, an account called "Mr. Mopf Chatter" has taken a picture of Mr. Sucha to create an AI-based clip that has caused misunderstanding and damage to the public. The clip has been viewed more than 3 million times. It is currently under investigation for the person behind it to prosecute the law.

Dr. Nutsuk also stated that the legal department is examining some of the more content of the chapter "Insert the Necklace" that Ms. Rukchuk used to criticize the devaluation of the Mala Necklace play, and that the monarchy, if found guilty, will act according to the law. There is also a political party post about the Privy Council, before such a woman shares a post that says that the act or intent is obvious.

However, Dr. Nutsuk confirmed that the notice was not an oral indictment, but an exercise of legal rights, stating that even if a public person can be criticized, they must not overstep their rights or use insulting phrases beyond their limits, and that such criticism must be in the public interest of the law.

When asked whether there would be any prosecution against people sharing such messages or video clips, Dr Nutsuen stated that if they were shared without knowing the facts or due to misunderstandings, they would be considered on a case-by-case basis. But if they were found to be shared with the intention of insulting or damaging, they would be prosecuted in all cases by law, warning people to use their judgment to share information online. In the end, no one could be prosecuted because of the sharing of information that was illegally entered into the network. There could also be an offence under the Computer Act.

It also states that although the MP has the privilege of protection during council meetings, if it is a criminal case and a resolution from the council to be sent to the prosecution, it can enter legal proceedings and if it does not meet the investigator, it can be issued a warrant.

For the lawsuit between Mr. Suchang and Ms. Rukshuk, Dr. Nutthasuth stated that Mr. Suchang informed Ms. Rukshuk of defamation and four computer cases together consisting of

1. The lawsuit concerning the Sky Nine Building

2. Post case alleging ministers coming from electoral fraud

3. Post case accusing Mr. Suchang of protecting the wrong person. In case of the police release of a graft agency survey.

4. Post accuses of being degrading.