Watching the Olympic ice dance competition this year was both thrilling and frustrating. It’s clear that judging in such a subjective sport can often feel unfair when home-country favoritism creeps in. From personal experience as a figure skating fan, I have noticed how certain scores sometimes don't reflect the skaters’ actual performance and artistry on the ice. This year's Free Dance segment was no exception, with some judges appearing reluctant to award the Canadian pair Gilles and Poirier their well-deserved bronze medal. The detailed score tallies showed tight competition among teams from France, the USA, and Canada. Despite attempts by some to downplay the Canadians' performance, the skill, precision, and emotional expression displayed by Gilles and Poirier ultimately won over the majority of judges and fans alike. Seeing them fight through this adversity and secure a podium finish felt like a testament to their hard work and resilience. In addition to the drama of the scoring, this event highlighted the broader issue of transparency and fairness in Olympic judging panels. Discussions among fans across social media often point to the necessity of having more objective and unbiased judging systems in place to preserve the integrity of the sport. Fans want to see athletes judged purely on merit rather than nationality. From my personal viewpoint, these moments—while disappointing—make the victories even sweeter. Supporting the Canadian team through positive social media movements like #TeamCanada and witnessing their success despite obstacles provided a sense of pride and connection as a fan. Ice dance is truly an art form that deserves fair appreciation, and I hope future competitions continue to evolve towards more just and standardized scoring.