From my own research and analysis, Iran’s unconventional approach to warfare truly emphasizes economic attrition over direct confrontation. The use of low-cost drones and proxy forces provides Tehran with a strategic advantage to pressure key choke points like the Strait of Hormuz, threatening global oil supplies and forcing massive defensive expenditures from the U.S. and its allies. This mosaic style of defense involves dispersed, guerrilla-like tactics where centralized command is minimal, allowing Iran to adapt quickly and maintain plausible deniability. The strategic focus seems to be on draining the enemy’s resources by compelling continuous, high-cost responses in naval deployments, missile interceptions, and intelligence operations. This systemic strain can prolong conflict dynamics without traditional battlefield engagements. What stands out in this cost war is the disproportionate spending difference: Iran invests around a million dollars per missile or drone system deployed, but compels adversaries to expend exponentially more on high-tech countermeasures and protecting regional assets, including Israel. This tactic maximizes psychological and economic pressure while minimizing Tehran's losses. Moreover, the geopolitical ramifications ripple beyond the immediate conflict zone. Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz impact global oil markets, often triggering price spikes and market panic which further influence international economic stability. Understanding this 'mosaic war' sheds light on modern asymmetric conflicts where endurance and economic resilience replace traditional military dominance. For those interested in Middle Eastern geopolitics or unconventional warfare strategies, delving into Iran’s economic-centric war paradigm offers valuable insights into how emerging military doctrines evolve in the 21st century.