In recent political conversations, hashtags like #LibreNuncaMas and #FueraSocialismo have gained traction among users expressing frustration with current governance and socialist policies. These movements often arise in contexts where a significant portion of nationalists participate in government roles, which can cause tension among different political groups. The reference to "70% of the nationalists working in the government" indicates a notable involvement of nationalist parties in the administration, potentially influencing public opinion and policy-making. The mention of a "30%" counter group suggests a division in political allegiance, possibly pointing to opposition factions dissatisfied with the status quo. Understanding these hashtags and their underlying messages requires considering the broader socio-political environment. The call to action phrases such as #SeVan and #FueraFamilion emphasize demands for significant change or removal of existing political figures or parties. Notably, such movements often intensify around election periods, as hinted by #EnNoviembre, indicating a pivotal time for political decision-making and public mobilization. These discussions reflect the dynamic nature of political engagement on social media, where users share sentiments, organize protests, and voice opinions. Social movements harness these platforms to amplify their causes, gain support, and influence public discourse. In summary, the hashtags and commentary reveal widespread sentiments against socialism and certain political families or groups, juxtaposed with a nationalistic presence within governmental roles. This ongoing polarization highlights the complex political landscape and the importance of understanding diverse perspectives during election seasons and political debates.