Or actually, nature and humans are the same thing.

There is one thing that the authors have noticed lately: when we look at things that humans do, we tend to look at them as separate from nature. For example, if humans build a dam, we say that it is a human construction, as opposed to the dam of the beaver, which is a natural creation, or culturally and socially itself, some bad values can be labeled as unnatural, such as the kind of love that the West calls homosexuality. It has also been accused of being unnatural to humans, where the human-nature mindset is separated from each other by a foundation, and then it stems from human-centered, as exalted above animals and other natures, as in the way. Judo-Christian thinking is that God created man in the image of God (or man as a reflection of God), or even in Thai Buddhism, he sees man as a salute animal (which, if he asks the polar bear, he might think that we are more of a hellbeast). Personally, if he cuts out religion, man's view of himself as superior to nature, the author thinks that he is narcissistic and dangerous, because humans from the past have always relied on other things. Man is not just body and soul, but human body is connected to all around us. Or, frankly, we cannot live without water and air or even food. Animals and plants, or even in ourselves, what makes us up are chemical elements, biological molecules, and we still have countless bacteria that we can't lack (inside the intestines, on the skin, and so on), and our self-isolation view of nature makes us love them less, hurting the world, trying to change the world in different ways that ultimately come back to hurting humans (if close to ourselves, if we cut down trees around a house in the sun, the house will heat up, or if we cut down trees on him, risk landslides, for example). The authors do not argue that nature itself may have some cruelty, and that humans overcome it in a practical way and dominate. The world above other animals that we were afraid of was beneficial to humans (or, on the other hand, that humans created nature in their own way), but in a sense, the author said that we should build a bond with it as something that created us. There was a saying that Einstein once said that he believed in God, but not God as a self or a person, but God as nature (nature is the creator by itself, and we are part of it), and that ultimately man is an animal, even the animality in man himself. Humans are uncontrollable, such that we cannot force ourselves to be sick. At least you can't force yourself not to be hungry, because hunger is the nature of living. So all this, the author just wants to think about whether the idea that we want to overcome nature in all dimensions can hurt us as nature is us.

.

Back at the point of human creation, the author came up with the question in his mind: If humans are natural, can man-made things be natural, such as cars, can washing machines be natural? This may not have a fixed answer, but the author himself thinks that if the laws of the universe were interconnected, like the water we eat today, once its molecules could float in space until millions of times pass into our glass. In this sense, the water we eat would be older than we might bring it, but when we eat it, it becomes part of us (at least until the biological processes of the body drive it out). The car we drive may be determined by the universe to be built by humans.