I HATE when love triangles aren't an actual triangle but a 2/3 triangle where ch

As someone who enjoys shows with complex relationship dynamics, I’ve noticed that love triangles often fall short when they're not genuinely triangular. A classic love triangle involves three characters each connected by romantic feelings, creating tension and drama. However, many narratives feature what feels more like a 'two-thirds triangle,' where two characters vie for the affection of the third, but those two do not have any romantic feelings toward each other. This shape doesn’t create the same emotional complexity or relational depth expected. In my experience, introducing a genuinely triangular dynamic—where all three characters share intersecting feelings—is far more compelling. It demands that the story explore more nuanced interactions and conflicts. This complexity is even more enriching when the triangle includes queer relationships, reflecting authentic LGBTQ+ experiences that are often underrepresented. A true gay love triangle challenges typical tropes and allows for unique storytelling angles, showing the multifaceted nature of love and attraction. Moreover, emphasizing genuine connections among all characters helps avoid reductive storytelling where the 'triangle' essentially functions as a single line of rivalry. It encourages writers to develop each character’s perspective and the complications that arise between every relationship within the trio. This approach not only improves character development but also enhances audience engagement because the emotional stakes feel real and unpredictable. In sum, embracing a complete love triangle—especially one that includes diverse orientations—adds depth and authenticity to narratives. It creates a richer viewing experience that resonates more genuinely with viewers seeking stories about love in all its forms.