21 June 69

Clause 4. Based on the comparison of property, liabilities, income, expenditure, money should be assessed. Details of such documents are provided. There are reasonable grounds to ask the NCC to verify whether the filing of property and liabilities accounts in case of the discharge of the office of the NCC on 12 Dec 2025 is a filing of property and liabilities accounts and the document contains false statements or conceals facts that should be notified and whether there is a behavior to believe that there is no intention to show the origin of property or liabilities:

Does the Congressman's salary income of 1,200,000 baht falsely refer to the meeting allowance income that is not informed, whether the Commissioner in 2025 is a cover-up of facts that should be informed, whether the Sep 2025 People's Party contribution expenditure of 200,000 baht that is not informed, whether it is a cover-up of facts that should be informed?

234 Increased Property Details of 85,484 Baht Not Specified in Expenditure Is there any way to believe that there is no intention of showing the origin of other property?

A list of loans from the company, funds limited to an unspecified date / month / year contracted, and the amount of the loan in accordance with the contract shows the balance of 146,070 baht. The network has a behavior to believe whether the intention is not to show the origin of the debt, a list of other liabilities with evidence, including two items worth 1,428,194.24 baht that indicate the balance is higher than the contract debt, whether the increase in the contract is due to anything unusual, and the details of the supporting documents that do not indicate the number of sheets of each item, but the signature of the filing is signed to the network. Details of property accounting documents and liabilities filed in full contravention of section 105?

Article 5. Requests the NCC to investigate this petition in accordance with the practice of the NCC as a petitioner to the Supreme Court, the criminal division of the political office holder, such as the Red Number case No. 46 / 2025, which is judged in part as follows: "Judges that the NCC accused deliberately does not file an account of property and liabilities and documentation with the petitioner and has the behavior to believe that it has the intention not to show the origin of property and liabilities in the case of dismissal of the constituency congressman in accordance with the Organic Act on Preventing and Combating Corruption. 2018 Section 114, second paragraph (1), shall forever revoke the accused's candidacy under section 81, constituting article 114, third paragraph.... "

Mr. Rakkai said that the audit of property and liabilities is not only the case of Miss Rakshuk, but that there are about 400 discharged MPs whose accounts have been disclosed by the NCC (there are about 100 cases that the NCC has not yet disclosed), as well as each of the minister's property accounts, each of which, when compared with the accounts, has almost all the observations to be verified, which requires each person to submit to the NCC to continue, some of which are submitted to the NCC. It's gone, but it's not notified. Anyone who's already been petitioned has to wait and see if the NCC has asked the petitioner for clarification.