It’s in your bread…
I’ve been talking about glyphosate and its harmful effects for years. A massive study that the FDA used to prove the safety of glyphosate was recently retracted because it was found to be ghostwritten by Monsanto, the company that created glyphosate.
Discovery in Monsanto/Bayer lawsuits has revealed internal company documents, known as the "Monsanto Papers," suggesting efforts to influence EPA assessments, ghostwrite scientific studies, and discredit independent research regarding Roundup's (glyphosate) safety. These documents point to manipulated data and a campaign to conceal cancer risks from regulators.
* Key Discovery Findings: Documents showed that Monsanto officials sought to influence EPA scientists regarding the toxicity of glyphosate, the main ingredient in Roundup.
* "Ghostwritten" Research: Evidence emerged that Monsanto staff helped write scientific articles that appeared to be written by independent academics, which argued for the safety of glyphosate.
* Manipulating Studies: Emails indicated that Monsanto attempted to suppress or manipulate studies that found a link between glyphosate and cancer.
* Regulatory Impact: While the EPA has maintained that glyphosate is safe, discovery documents highlighted the agency's heavy reliance on industry-provided data in their evaluations.
So while the EPA deemed the amount of glyphosate in foods to be exponentially higher than what the EWG says is safe, based on the discovery information, above, I personally don’t trust this at all.
-Gabbi
LSN, CPT, BSc, Published Author
Having researched and shared concerns about glyphosate exposure for years, I can relate to the growing unease many feel after learning about the Monsanto Papers. These internal documents reveal that Monsanto engaged in ghostwriting scientific articles and influencing EPA scientists, which casts serious doubt on the integrity of glyphosate safety approvals. What’s particularly alarming is the presence of glyphosate residues in common bread brands, as highlighted in recent independent testing. For example, popular breads like Nature’s Own Butter Bread and Dave’s Killer Bread have been detected with glyphosate levels exceeding the Environmental Working Group's benchmark for cancer risk, which is set at just 160 parts per billion for daily consumption. This information isn't just abstract—it means that everyday foods we often consider safe may expose us to harmful chemicals. From personal experience, I’ve shifted toward purchasing organic and non-GMO bread options to avoid glyphosate contamination. While these products can be pricier, the peace of mind about reducing pesticide intake is invaluable. Additionally, paying attention to brands that prioritize transparent sourcing and testing can help minimize exposure. It’s also crucial to stay informed about regulatory developments. The EPA's continued reliance on industry-provided data, combined with these revelations about ghostwritten research, suggests that consumers should critically evaluate official claims about glyphosate safety. Advocating for independent, transparent studies can help push for stricter regulations and safer food. In conclusion, understanding the scope of glyphosate contamination and corporate tactics to obscure risks empowers us to make safer food choices. Reducing consumption of conventional grains and supporting clean-label brands are practical steps we can take to protect our health in light of this troubling evidence.
See more comments