Should Kids Really Be on Livestreams?

So Wendy Ortiz went live the other day… with her kid front and center. I can’t decide what bothers me more: the fact that a child has zero say in being broadcast to thousands of strangers, or that some parents act like putting their kid online is just another type of content strategy.

Look, I get wanting to share your life, but kids aren’t props. They don’t get to consent, they can’t control how clips of them will live online forever, and it’s kinda unsettling watching strangers comment on someone else’s child in real time.

At a certain point, it stops being “cute” and starts feeling like exploitation, or at the very least, oversharing for clout.

What do you think? Is bringing your kid into livestreams harmless fun, or crossing a line? What would you do?

#creatorstruggles #wendyortiz #tiktok #letschat #AskLemon8

2025/8/22 Edited to

... Read moreFeaturing children in livestreams has become a growing trend among content creators, but it raises important ethical questions about consent, privacy, and exploitation. Children lack the ability to provide informed consent to be broadcast live to thousands, sometimes millions, of strangers. Unlike adults, they cannot control or understand the long-term consequences of their digital footprint. Parents or guardians who livestream with their children often treat their kids as background props or content enhancers without fully considering the impact this exposure can have on the child’s safety and wellbeing. The concept of “digital permanence” means clips or moments shared online could resurface years later, possibly harming the child’s reputation or personal boundaries. Moreover, live audiences can submit unsolicited comments, which might include inappropriate, harmful, or otherwise distressing feedback directed at the children on screen. This opens the door to online harassment or unwanted attention from strangers, which the child cannot properly defend against or comprehend. The OCR content from the article’s images hints at dissatisfaction within the livestreaming community about oversharing and the ethical responsibility creators hold toward their audiences and their family members. This concern is echoed in debates surrounding influencers like Wendy Ortiz, who have brought their kids into the streaming frame, raising questions about where the boundary lies between authentic sharing and exploitation. Experts argue that parents should prioritize their children's privacy and safety first by carefully considering what is appropriate to share and ensuring they have consent as they grow older. Practical steps include limiting live exposure, avoiding disclosing personal or sensitive information, and educating children about their digital rights when they become old enough. The discussion around livestreaming children also connects to broader themes of influencer responsibility, child protection laws, and the evolving notion of digital raise and digital citizenship. Parents and creators must weigh the desire for engagement and content growth against the long-term welfare of their children to ensure livestreaming remains a positive experience rather than a source of potential harm or exploitation.

165 comments

Catty Rivera 🧸's images
Catty Rivera 🧸

She gets a lot of hate for posting anything, especially when she post that she’s out. People start calling her a bad mother because they don’t see her kid around, but then she tries to post her kid and people like you post stuff like this? Influencers can never win with such a judgmental crowd.

See more(6)
Imani <3's images
Imani <3

So she doesn’t post her kid it’s “she’s a horrible mom and doesn’t see her kid” she posts her kid it’s “her exploiting her kid” can’t win at all

See more(5)

See more comments