The phrase "Abolish ICE" has quickly become a rallying cry, but it's important to understand the depth behind this demand. ICE, or Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is often criticized not just for its actions but for the system it represents, which many view as enforcing racialized policies and unjust immigration laws. From my experience and observation, the call to abolish ICE is not about eliminating immigration enforcement altogether but about challenging the foundation of these practices that disproportionately target marginalized communities. ICE has been described as a terrorist organization that enforces arbitrary and racial laws, highlighting that its existence is tied to a broader culture of systemic discrimination. It’s crucial to recognize that simply renaming or reforming ICE without addressing the underlying hyper-racialized society will not stop the cycle of ethnic cleansing and militarization of borders. True reform requires dismantling not only ICE but also the entrenched institutions and beliefs that normalize racial profiling and mass deportations. Furthermore, this movement connects to broader social justice efforts aimed at combating institutional racism within government agencies. Taking a precise stance on abolishing all concepts that support ICE's operations helps to focus the movement on structural change rather than cosmetic fixes. A personal takeaway from engaging with this topic is the necessity to fill out one's demands clearly and beyond surface-level reforms. Only by articulating these demands precisely can activists prevent them from being twisted into ineffective measures. This approach helps ensure that calls for justice lead to meaningful change rather than temporary adjustments. In conclusion, abolishing ICE means more than removing an agency—it means confronting a system that has enabled racialized immigration policies and seeking radical change to create a more just and humane society.