Dissected!!!The brains of people have Trauma!!!

The author is writing an article, doing research on the Cognitive Knowledge that affects personality expression. There are a lot of commentary dramas. The most recent example is that there is a post about some accessories that go to work, and the seniors say that it looks a little better. The seniors talk about the image, but the writer is not satisfied (why? Which speech atmosphere does not know?) We come to separate the issues. First floor / /

Image image

- per person = like, bear well

- per organization = kalabha, decency

Body accessories

- Good. Resistant. Brand is not luxurious.

- Too affordable.

Senior

- Worked before.

- Speaking of recommendations (will look stretched or really good)

- Etiquette of speaking

Preliminary information. Separate the preliminary points.

1. There are seniors who have worked before saying that wearing accessories a little better will look better.

2.Etiquette of speaking, suggesting it is expedient or not (she sees the contempt of the piece she is wearing)

How can you comment on these two facts without any emotional guidance?

Issue 1: "Put on accessories a little better, it will look better" (The Professional Advice)

• Facts: In social psychology, humans judge at First Impression. Some goods are designed for "strength and use," not "grace."

• Analysis: This advice of seniors is "Functional Correctness," because in some occupations, image is "commodity." Investing with accessories that reinforce image is upgrading the value of the product (itself) for her own benefit.

Issue 2: "Etiquette of Speech / Introduction" (The Communication Etiquette)

• Facts: The same Message, but if the messenger has an unstable "Emotional Filter," it will be distorted.

• Analysis: * If a senior speaks in the middle of public = is defective in etiquette, but the data remains true.

• If the seniors speak privately = is Coaching

• Conclusion: She sees "insult of" as a Logical Fallacy summary, because the word "put it better" does not mean "the original is vile," but "the original does not fit this context."

3. Conclusion on the "potential development" basis if we separate "the good of the person" from "the appropriateness of the tool."

• "The endurance of things" and "self-improvement" are mixed with "times" (which are different).

• Facts: People can be "good people who improve themselves" along with "people who dress correctly over time." These two things are not contradictory.

Halo effect

The Halo Effect is a "Cognitive Bias," where one's brain uses one's "only highlight" to judge the whole picture without any real information. It is that the brain creates a "Halo" to obscure other facts. When we are impressed by something in someone, the brain in the emotional / instinctive part immediately concludes to save energy, such as seeing a good-looking person, the brain automatically concludes that he must be good-looking, smart and reliable.

The Halo Effect causes something called "Cognitive Blindness."

Usually we see that some people will claim merit, national, religious, such as the merit class, praying regularly, but cursing the flashes, wondering why merit does not help to calm down.

The answer is

Most people have the Mental Model: "Philanthropy = Good People." When there is a halo of the word "Good People" over that person, the brain of those around you (or even those who do it themselves) will develop Cognitive Dissonance or cognitive conflict, trying to find a reason to erase the image of "blaming people" so that the image of good people remains = even if I curse you, but I am still a good person, on the other hand, if I do not talk about merit, but instead, most people think that this is good, such as improving yourself according to your potential, long work (must Definitely an expert.) But!!! What does it have to do with the story of the sermon and the image we should consider?

Trauma

The inferiority in the brain, the subconscious scar, the knot above the reason is called Selective Perception, such as 100 words, 99 words of technical cause and effect, but one word pokes the knot of "difficulty" or "clan" in the mind, the receiver immediately closes the Prefrontal Cortex and uses the Amygdala to respond.

People don't speak well, they don't talk about things, but they are "insulting my life," so I have to declare myself to support this injustice, and it is the Echo Chamber of the same people, which is that there are people who are blind to the eyes, they feel like "I've been oppressed." When I see someone ranting about this knot, they come to protect themselves to comfort themselves. It is a gathering of Low Awareness who use pity to navigate logic. Think about it. Do you know someone like this? Everyone knows who we are! How did he get this position? The person with the retinue said to be doing well. Appropriate. That person.

So our brain and body have a very strong defense system. It's a survival instinct that's been recorded in DNA 🧬 since the days of single-celled organism. The physical response is automatic. Fear drives out into action. People are not born like this in one life. It's many worlds. Don't worry about fate. Why is it so difficult? Why are people so insincere? When we don't stop and reach true inner resolution.

(This story is a long time. If you finish reading the book (for a long time, 4-5 hundred pages), you will continue to write.

# lemon 8 diary # traumarecovery # Emotions # Brain # Thoughts